no show

20:30 Oct 30, 2020 

It's not brilliantly written, but it's not that bad or unclear in EN. We understand the implicit bit, which I've put in brackets below:

X "is one positive, along with [another positive, namely that there are] no show-stopping safety issues."

It's important to note that when there's a hyphen between two English words, often you need to keep those words together; they constitute a unit of meaning by themselves. You can't just lop one of them off.

As a side note, there was another Kudoz question recently where a phrasal verb got chopped in half (in a proposed answer or discussion, I think, not by the asker). Even when the two parts of a phrasal verb are separated by one or more words, you've got to consider them together to determine the meaning. These all mean different things, for instance:

Take to
Take from
Take over
Take in
Take up
Take off

...etc.

Maybe in German, "show-stopping" and all those "take + prep" verbs would be single words. And in FR they might be single words or the gender/number thing would make it clear what went with what. But in EN you've got to get used to the need to consider that 2 words can create a meaning together that neither has alone.

22:49 Oct 29, 2020 

For once, I have given the whole sentence so it does not matter as I have given the full context. But I think it's very awkward: along with no =without in plain English

18:18 Oct 29, 2020 

you won't get the right answer if don't start by asking the right question.

14:36 Oct 29, 2020 

The phrase here isn't "no show." It's "show stopping," which is negated by the "no."