Aug 2, 2002 20:26
21 yrs ago
1 viewer *
Spanish term
medie relacion de dependencia
Spanish to English
Law/Patents
El contratista es el responsable del diseno, suministro, pruebas, instalacion y construccion de la Obra senaladas en esta especificaciones, previa autorizacion del Ente Contratante, sin que medie relacion de dependencia con el Ente Licitante.
Proposed translations
(English)
Proposed translations
-1
4 mins
Selected
notwithstanding any relationship of dependence with the Bidder
Spanish requries a verb for this phrase, English does not. literally, "without the relationship of dependence with the Bidder having any bearing [on the matter].
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+1
11 mins
Paulina Gómez
Colombia
Colombia
Native in Spanish
Colombia
Quality-Respect for clients & deadlines
Native in: Spanish
Works in: English to Spanish, Spanish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
133
autonomously, independently from....
or, The contractor is responsible...., independently from the company that won the contract (tender).
+1
19 mins
Robert INGLEDEW
Argentina
Argentina
Native in Spanish
&
English
Argentina
OIL, GAS, ENERGY, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT...
Native in: English 
, Spanish
Works in: English to Spanish, Spanish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
1940
Please read below
The contractor is responsible for the design, supply, testing, installation and construction of the Work stated in these specifications, with the prior authorization of the Contracting Agency, with no relationship regarding the Bidding Agency.
In other words, the Bidding Agency does not intervene in this process.
In other words, the Bidding Agency does not intervene in this process.
25 mins
[without there] being any relationship of dependency [with]
Evidently there are three entities involved here. The contratista does the work, having been authorized to do so by the Ente Contratante, but the contratista has no relationship of dependency with the Ente Licitante.
Presumably the Ente Licitante lets the bid, the Ente Contratante enters into a contract with the Ente Licitante, and the contratista is hired by the Ente Contratante to do the work. The point of the language here is that the contratista owes nothing to the Ente Licitante. Its realationship is solely with the Ente Contratante. If it doesn't perform, the Ente Licitante's recourse is against the Ente Contratante, which in turn has an action against the contratista.
Presumably the Ente Licitante lets the bid, the Ente Contratante enters into a contract with the Ente Licitante, and the contratista is hired by the Ente Contratante to do the work. The point of the language here is that the contratista owes nothing to the Ente Licitante. Its realationship is solely with the Ente Contratante. If it doesn't perform, the Ente Licitante's recourse is against the Ente Contratante, which in turn has an action against the contratista.
Something went wrong...