Spanish term
Economía del Riesgo y de la Información
4 +1 | economics of risk and information | philgoddard |
5 | Economics of Risk and Information | nweatherdon |
5 | Risk and Information Economics | jude dabo |
Non-PRO (1): philgoddard
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
economics of risk and information
His other interests include the economics of risk and information...
The economics of risk and information – he has written several papers on the adverse selection, the value of information, and the design of insurance contracts with imperfect information.
Economics of Risk and Information
The economics of risk has to do with ways of modelling risk aversion, typically expressed as risk loving or risk averse, and these are mathematical conditions. Then, how this affects economic decisions.
Economics of information is a little different, and less established. I don't think there's a mainstream paradigm here. But basically, that when you have less information then the quality of decision making is lower. It involves analysis of costs of getting information, costs of digesting or being able to make use of information, and the end effects that this may have on the quality of decisions made.
Something went wrong...