Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
the house was droopy and sick
English answer:
ramshackle / dilapidated / shabby / crumbling
English term
the house was droopy and sick
Could you please explain how a house can be droopy and sick. I know it's figurative but how does it look actually?
Thank you very much in advance!
Feb 23, 2015 14:44: acetran Created KOG entry
Feb 23, 2015 14:44: acetran changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/1818886">acetran's</a> old entry - "the house was droopy and sick"" to ""ramshackle / dilapidated / shabby / crumbling / ""
Feb 23, 2015 14:45: acetran changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/1818886">acetran's</a> old entry - "the house was droopy and sick"" to ""ramshackle / dilapidated / shabby / crumbling / ""
Responses
ramshackle / dilapidated / shabby / crumbling /
agree |
Veronika McLaren
1 hr
|
Hey, thanks :)
|
|
agree |
magdadh
1 hr
|
Thanks!
|
|
disagree |
Carol Gullidge
: No, as we now know from Gallagy's context, the house remained unchanged after the children's prank. The house was indeed dilapidated, but that isn't what this is about.//Where is your required explanation?
15 hrs
|
disagree |
Yvonne Gallagher
: * not an explanation at all. And this is wrong in the CONTEXT//I don't do "tactical disagrees". Amazed you think this is correct and * is an "explanation". Read the book!
5 days
|
Tactical disagree :)
|
the house was like the occupant Boo Radley: haunted, sick=personification of sorts
..."The house was low, was once white with a deep front porch and green shutters, but had long ago darkened to the color of the slate-gray yard around it. Rain-rotted shingles drooped over the eaves of the veranda; oak trees kept the sun away. The remains of a picket drunkenly guarded the front yard- a "swept" yard that was never swept-where johnson grass and rabbit-tobacco grew in abundance.
Inside the house lived a malevolent phantom. People said he existed, but Jem and I had never seen him. People said he went out at night when the moon was down, and peeped in windows. When people's azaleas froze in a cold snap, it was because he had breathed on them. .."
Boo's action of stabbing his father in the leg with a scissors has also been described
"and the day Mr. Radley took Arthur home, people said the house died..."
Stephanie Crawford ... said his head was like a skull lookin' at her".
Jem's description of Boo: "about six-and-a-half feet tall, judging from his tracks; he dined on raw squirrels and any cats he could catch, that's why his hands were
bloodstained- if you ate an animal raw, you could never wash the blood
off. There was a long jagged scar that ran across his face; what teeth
he had were yellow and rotten; his eyes popped, and he drooled most of
the time..."
So Dill dares Jem to "just go up and touch the house."
"Jem threw open the gate and sped to the side of the house, slapped it with his palm and ran back past us, not waiting to see if his foray was successful. Dill and I followed on his heels. Safely on our porch, panting and out of breath, we looked back.
The old house was the same, droopy and sick, but as we stared down the street we thought we saw an inside shutter move. Flick. A tiny, almost invisible movement, and the house was still."
So really, the house is being likened to Boo, sick, creepy, malevolent, scary, a phantom etc etc
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2015-02-17 23:47:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
And yes, the house is also run-down and shabby looking but I think the eeriness, creeepiness and frightening aspect of it as like a haunted house "Inside the house lived a malevolent phantom" needs to be kept.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2015-02-17 23:52:01 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
"the house was the same" =unchanged. Boo didn't come out. The door didn't open. So it was like it was before Jem ran up and slapped it EXCEPT for the fact the kids think they see a slight movement of the "inside shutter. Flick..."
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
: No need to quote half the book...
2 hrs
|
Thanks Tina:-) Just wanted to make sure those who haven't read the book knew the context and there will probably be more questions...(This is only Chap. 1!)
|
|
agree |
Carol Gullidge
: Actually, it's only by reading the whole (or most) of this passage that you realise what is meant - which is that there were no dire consequences of their actions
8 hrs
|
Yes, indeed. Thanks Carol:-)
|
|
agree |
Veronika McLaren
5 days
|
Thanks:-). glad some people actually care about context.
|
|
agree |
Phoenix III
5 days
|
Many thanks:-)
|
unkempt and decaying
disagree |
Carol Gullidge
: No, as we now know from Gallagy's context, the house was indeed unkempt, but that isn't what "unchanged" refers to. Disagree with your (lack of!) explanation//Well, without any context, we were ALL in the dark ;)
7 hrs
|
Yah, I think I was wrong
|
|
disagree |
Yvonne Gallagher
: with Carol
5 days
|
agree |
acetran
: Just neutralising the tactical disagree :)
5 days
|
Thanks :) I think I was wrong though :)
|
Discussion
Do you really care nothing about CONTEXT? Or care about the fact that I gave you an answer as someone who has not just read the book but taught it as well to exam classes? The house is being compared to Boo and you could NOT call a person "ramshackle / dilapidated / crumbling" and "shabby" wouldn't be a synonym here at all. You pick an answer (wrong in this context) with the wonderful explanation of * and "the same" was not explained at all...! Yet another time I ask myself why I bother...
So PLEASE, PLEASE don't forget to post as much context as possible with each question! Without this, any answers - or most, at any rate - will be little more than uninformed guesses.
Although I had read and loved this book, I still didn't recognise it for the great piece of fiction that it is from the context provided, and I'm afraid I had rather dismissed it as a piece of rather sloppy writing. Knowing that it is from a child's p.o.v. makes all the difference to one's perception and understanding of the writing.
Context is everything