(d) Geen collectieve acties. Er is geen juridische basis of erkenning in deze arbitragesectie voor claims op collectieve of geconsolideerde basis of op bases waarbij claims worden ingediend in een vermeende hoedanigheid als vertegenwoordiger van het grote publiek (inclusief, maar niet beperkt tot, claims door een particuliere procureur-generaal).

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 hrs (2016-06-11 11:58:55 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

https://nest.com/nl/legal/sales-terms/

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day3 hrs (2016-06-11 15:43:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I don't know.
And I have no time, and may lack the expertise, to find out about it.

We have a literal translation.
If this is considered to be inappropriate another translation is to be found, either an existing one or a first-in-class solution with you being the pioneer translator.

If your translation was incapable of sufficiently capturing the content of the source expression you might add the English expression between brackets.

found this in a big DELL .TMX (from my TAUS collection):

NEITHER CUSTOMER NOR DELL SHALL BE ENTITLED TO JOIN OR CONSOLIDATE CLAIMS BY OR AGAINST OTHER CUSTOMERS, OR ARBITRATE ANY CLAIM AS A REPRESENTATIVE OR CLASS ACTION OR IN A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL CAPACITY.
=
HET IS DE KLANT EN DELL NIET TOEGESTAAN GEZAMENLIJK VORDERINGEN DOOR OF TEGEN ANDERE KLANTEN IN TE DIENEN OF VORDERINGEN TE BEOORDELEN ALS RECHTSVERTEGENWOORDIGERS, IN GEZAMENLIJKE PROCEDURES OF IN DE ROL VAN "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL".

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 mins (2016-06-10 12:09:00 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

zie ook:

"(e) Geen class arbitrage. De arbiter zal alleen schadevergoeding toewijzen ten gunste van de individuele partij die verhaal instelt en alleen voor zover nodig is voor het verhaal in de individuele claim van die partij. U EN NEST KOMEN OVEREEN DAT ELKE PARTIJ ALLEEN CLAIMS IN KAN STELLEN TEGEN DE ANDERE IN UW OF HAAR INDIVIDUELE HOEDANIGHEID, EN NIET ALS EEN EISER OF LID VAN EEN CLASS IN EEN CLASS, ‘REPRESENTATIVE’, OF ‘PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’ PROCEDURE. […]"

(https://nest.com/nl/legal/terms-of-service/ )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 mins (2016-06-10 12:12:37 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

vergelijk bovenstaande NL Nest ref met:

"(e) No class arbitration. The arbitrator may award declaratory or injunctive relief only in favour of the individual party seeking relief and only to the extent necessary to provide relief warranted by that party's individual claim. YOU AND NEST AGREE THAT EACH MAY BRING CLAIMS AGAINST THE OTHER ONLY IN YOUR OR ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, AND NOT AS A PLAINTIFF OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY PURPORTED CLASS, REPRESENTATIVE, OR PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL PROCEEDING."

(https://nest.com/uk/legal/terms-of-service/ )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day4 mins (2016-06-11 12:06:14 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

see also: "Deze prikkels zijn voor professionele organisaties met welluidende namen als Public Interest Bounty Hunters en Taxpayers Against Fraud reden genoeg om met zoveel mogelijk klokkenluiders een pact te sluiten en zich vervolgens met man en macht in te zetten voor de handhaving van het recht en de bescherming van een ieders belastinggelden. Zie daar de gedachte van de 'private attorney general': de burger die de taak op zich neemt fraudeurs in rechte te vervolgen en zichzelf daarom tot advocaat van de overheid bombardeert. Niettegenstaande de aanduiding als 'particuliere officier van justitie' kan een qui tam-eiser alleen een civiele actie tot schadevergoeding instellen. Aangezien hij de overheid vertegenwoordigt, is hiervoor niet noodzakelijk dat hij zelf schade heeft geleden.(10) " (http://typo3.vara.nl/Item.2654.0.html?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=570... )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day5 mins (2016-06-11 12:08:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

"Private attorney general is an informal term usually used today in the United States to refer to a private attorney who brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting the general public and not just the plaintiff, on behalf of a citizen or group of citizens.[1]

The attorney is considered a "private attorney general" and may, at the equitable discretion of the court, be entitled to recover attorney's fees if he or she prevails. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra incentive to private attorneys to pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at large."

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_attorney_general )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day3 hrs (2016-06-11 15:55:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

See also bottom of page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_attorney_general

"See also: Qui tam, an analogous concept" (leading here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_tam )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day6 hrs (2016-06-11 18:38:27 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

"qui tam (noun):

A civil action brought under a criminal statute which allows a private individual to sue for a penalty both personally and on behalf of the Crown (government, or a specified public institution). Also in extended use: †a person who brings such an action, an informer (obsolete).

Origin:
Late 17th century. From post-classical Latin qui tam, the first words of the clause qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso sequitur ‘who sues as well for the lord the king as for himself’ from classical Latin quī who + tam so much, to such a degree."

(http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/qui-tam... )

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day6 hrs (2016-06-11 18:39:14 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

GARNER'S DICTIONARY OF LEGAL USAGE (online version via oxforddictionaries.com):

qui tam

[L. “who as well”] = an action under a statute that allows a private person to sue for a penalty, part of which the government or some specified public institution will receive. Etymologically speaking, the plaintiff is a suitor “who as well” sues for the state. E.g.:

• “The False Claims Act … includes provisions allowing private citizens to bring civil suits on behalf of the government. They're based on a principle called qui tam.”Rick Wartzman & Paul M. Barrett, For Whistle-Blowers, Tune May Change, Wall St. J., 27 Sept. 1989, at B1.
• “A statutory qui tam action is one brought against a public official to recover a penalty (treble damages) for the commission of injurious acts or for a failure to act in obedience to some duty.”State v. Town of Canute, 858 P.2d 436, 440–41 (Okla. 1993) (Opala, J., dissenting).

Qui tam lawsuits originated in the 13th century—when private persons would seek to protect the king's interest—and were embodied in statutes during the 15th century. In the U.S., qui tam lawsuits have

“been in existence … ever since the foundation of our government.”
Marvin v. Trout, 199 U.S. 212, 225 (1905) (per Peckham, J.).

They are usually reported as being in the name of the government ex rel. (= on the relation of) the private citizen. See "ex rel."

(http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/secondary/garner_dict_lega... )