This question was closed without grading. Reason: No acceptable answer
Jan 21, 2017 22:50
7 yrs ago
2 viewers *
Spanish term
renuncia a su repetición contra quien deba finalmente soportarlas
Spanish to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
compliance
The entire sentence is:
Las indemnizaciones abonadas no supondrán reconocimiento alguno de culpabilidad ni renuncia a su repetición contra quien deba finalmente soportarlas
Not sure what the second half of the sentence means, particularly "repetición".
Las indemnizaciones abonadas no supondrán reconocimiento alguno de culpabilidad ni renuncia a su repetición contra quien deba finalmente soportarlas
Not sure what the second half of the sentence means, particularly "repetición".
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 +1 | waiver to hte (right of) recovery... |
Mariana Serio
|
| 4 | waiver of the right to file a crossclaim against whosoever must ultimately pay them. |
Robert Carter
|
Proposed translations
13 mins
Robert Carter
Mexico
Mexico
Native in English
Specializes in field
Mexico
Translating full-time since 1998
Native in: English (Variant: British) 
Works in: Spanish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
1376
waiver of the right to file a crossclaim against whosoever must ultimately pay them.
Or words to that effect.
"Repetición" here means a crossclaim or action for recovery.
What I think it means is that if indemnities are paid, it does not mean that the party paying them is admitting any guilt or waiving the right to recover the amounts against whoever should ultimate foot the bill for those indemnities.
A crossclaim is a claim asserted between codefendants or coplaintiffs in a case and that relates to the subject of the original claim or counterclaim according to Black's Law Dictionary. A cross claim is filed against someone who is a co-defendant or co-plaintiff to the party who originates the crossclaim. In common law, a crossclaim is a demand made in a pleading that is filed against a party which is on the "same side" of the lawsuit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossclaim
"Repetición" here means a crossclaim or action for recovery.
What I think it means is that if indemnities are paid, it does not mean that the party paying them is admitting any guilt or waiving the right to recover the amounts against whoever should ultimate foot the bill for those indemnities.
A crossclaim is a claim asserted between codefendants or coplaintiffs in a case and that relates to the subject of the original claim or counterclaim according to Black's Law Dictionary. A cross claim is filed against someone who is a co-defendant or co-plaintiff to the party who originates the crossclaim. In common law, a crossclaim is a demand made in a pleading that is filed against a party which is on the "same side" of the lawsuit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossclaim
+1
15 mins
waiver to hte (right of) recovery...
...against the person who eventually bears such costs.
(Or something similar)
See definition of "repetición" below.
Good luck!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 mins (2017-01-21 23:09:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Waiver of the right, sorry.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 25 mins (2017-01-21 23:16:16 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.google.com.ar/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=we...
Also waiver of subrogation
http://www.execins.com/education/Waiver of Subrogation.pdf
(Or something similar)
See definition of "repetición" below.
Good luck!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 mins (2017-01-21 23:09:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Waiver of the right, sorry.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 25 mins (2017-01-21 23:16:16 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.google.com.ar/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=we...
Also waiver of subrogation
http://www.execins.com/education/Waiver of Subrogation.pdf
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Jennifer Levey
: "waiver of subrogation" is good in Mary's context - provided it is an expression that will be understood by her target readership.
13 hrs
|
Reference comments
13 hrs
Jennifer Levey
Chile
Chile
Native in English
Specializes in field
Chile
Human-scale Globalization
Native in: English (Variant: British) 
Works in: Spanish to English, French to English, English to Spanish, and 2 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
545
Reference:
"repetición" implies the existence of a prior error or confusion
"repetición" is a claim for the recovery of assets handed over "by mistake", in the absence of proper justification.
eg: (from the Chilean Civil Code)
Referring to conditional obligations:
Art. 1485. No puede exigirse el cumplimiento de la obligación condicional, sino verificada la condición totalmente. Todo lo que se hubiere pagado antes de efectuarse la condición suspensiva, podrá repetirse mientras no se hubiere cumplido.
Later, referring to situations of “confusion”:
Art. 1668. Si hay confusión entre uno de varios deudores solidarios y el acreedor, podrá el primero repetir contra cada uno de sus codeudores por la parte o cuota que respectivamente les corresponda en la deuda.
And also, referring to gambling:
Art. 2260. El juego y la apuesta no producen acción, sino solamente excepción. El que gana no puede exigir el pago. Pero si el que pierde, paga, no puede repetir lo pagado, a menos que se haya ganado con dolo.
eg: (from the Chilean Civil Code)
Referring to conditional obligations:
Art. 1485. No puede exigirse el cumplimiento de la obligación condicional, sino verificada la condición totalmente. Todo lo que se hubiere pagado antes de efectuarse la condición suspensiva, podrá repetirse mientras no se hubiere cumplido.
Later, referring to situations of “confusion”:
Art. 1668. Si hay confusión entre uno de varios deudores solidarios y el acreedor, podrá el primero repetir contra cada uno de sus codeudores por la parte o cuota que respectivamente les corresponda en la deuda.
And also, referring to gambling:
Art. 2260. El juego y la apuesta no producen acción, sino solamente excepción. El que gana no puede exigir el pago. Pero si el que pierde, paga, no puede repetir lo pagado, a menos que se haya ganado con dolo.
Something went wrong...