This question was closed without grading. Reason: No acceptable answer
Feb 6, 2019 11:29
5 yrs ago
2 viewers *
English term
constructs
English to Polish
Medical
Medical (general)
psychiatria
Tekst o objawach negatywnych schizofrenii i podrozdział zatytułowany "Negative symptoms: Constructs". W podrozdziale opisano podział objawów negatywnych na: primary and secondary, prominent, persistent and predominant i deficit syndrome. Poniżej przykłady:
The constructs currently considered as relevant to the negative dimension include affect blunted, alogia, anhedonia, asociality, and avolition.
There are different constructs to view negative symptoms: prominent, persistent and predominant, or primary and secondary.
The constructs currently considered as relevant to the negative dimension include affect blunted, alogia, anhedonia, asociality, and avolition.
There are different constructs to view negative symptoms: prominent, persistent and predominant, or primary and secondary.
References
| construct |
Frank Szmulowicz, Ph. D.
|
Reference comments
2 hrs
Frank Szmulowicz, Ph. D.
United States
United States
Native in English
&
Polish
Specializes in field
United States
On time, on target, on budget.
Native in: English 
, Polish
Works in: Polish to English, English to Polish, Russian to Polish, and 1 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
2217
Reference:
construct
A consensus has recently been reached on the following aspects: a) five constructs should be considered as negative symptoms, i.e. blunted affect, alogia, anhedonia, asociality and avolition; b) for each construct, symptoms due to identifiable factors, such as medication effects, psychotic symptoms or depression, should be distinguished from those regarded as primary; c) the five constructs cluster in two factors, one including blunted affect and alogia and the other consisting of anhedonia, avolition and asociality. In this paper, for each construct, we report the current definition; highlight differences among the main assessment instruments; illustrate quantitative measures, if available, and their relationship with the evaluations based on rating scales; and describe correlates as well as experimental models.
http://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/plain-content?id=99307
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2019-02-06 14:03:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
See also:
http://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/plain-content?id=99307
http://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/plain-content?id=99307
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2019-02-06 14:03:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
See also:
http://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/plain-content?id=99307
Discussion
stotą sporu są problemy definicyjne i kryteria diagnostyczne (por. Barrash i in., 1983; Czernikiewicz, 1986; Dahl, 1985; Dąbkowski, 1981; Gunderson i Singer, 1975; Grinker i in., 1968; Hartocollis, 1977; Kroll i in., 1981; Mack, 1975; Millon, 1981; Nelson i in., 1985; Perry i Klerman,1978; Sandell, 1989; Stone, 1980; Tyrer, 1988; Walentynowicz, 1990), których arbitralnie i dość dowolnie poszukuje się w opisach różnych zespołów psychopatologicznych, zaburzeniach zachowania się, wynikach testów psychologicznych i koncepcjach psychoanalitycznych.
http://www.psychologia.net.pl/artykul.php?level=12
http://psjd.icm.edu.pl/psjd/element/bwmeta1.element.psjd-5d6...