GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
00:24 Jul 8, 2015 |
English to Spanish translations [PRO] Tech/Engineering - Construction / Civil Engineering / Relevamiento | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: lugoben Local time: 14:50 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +1 | soporte de pie esférico |
| ||
4 +1 | mira/estadía estadimétrica graduada en pie/ft(0.0001 ft) |
|
Discussion entries: 1 | |
---|---|
soporte de pie esférico Explanation: In general measurements above water are performed using land survey equipment and are relatively simple and reliable provided a clear reference level is used. The standard method for surveying rock levels is described in CUR 154 [1991] and requires the use of a semi-spherical foot as a reference. As the semi-spherical foot staff is unusable under water or in the surf zone, echo-sounders are commonly used here. |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
mira/estadía estadimétrica graduada en pie/ft(0.0001 ft) Explanation: En topografía, una estadía o mira estadimétrica, también llamado estadal en Latinoamérica, es una regla graduada que permite mediante un nivel topográfico, medir desniveles, es decir, diferencias de altura. Con una mira, también se pueden medir distancias con métodos trigonométricos, o mediante un telémetro estadimétrico integrado dentro de un nivel topográfico, un teodolito, o bien un taquímetro. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mira_(topografía) A level staff, also called levelling rod, is a graduated wooden or aluminum rod, used with a levelling instrument to determine the difference in height between points or heights of points above a datum surface. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_staff If the knob is turned until the cross-hair is set to an exact staff graduation the combined sum of this staff value plus the reading on the micrometer scale will give the required staff value for the pointing. With the metric model of the micrometer, readings can be made in this way to the nearest hundredth of a millimeter, as compared with the estimation to a millimeter without the micrometer. The foot model allows direct reading on its scale to 0.0001 ft. (which is the graduation interval) and estimation can be made to half an interval. http://www.wild-heerbrugg.com/changing face.htm The multi-beam method shows even lower levels than the conventional staff method. This is remarkable because the conventional staff is able to measure all the holes and hence the multi-beam method cannot measure lower levels. Therefore the low levels of the multi-beam method can only be explained by the acoustic disruptions causing errors [HAUER, 2000]. A different method is the survey with the bucket of a hydraulic excavator. This method is not further discussed because no literature is available on this method. BOSMA, 2001 performed research into different survey techniques as well. He investigated the difference between the conventional staff and the spherical foot system. He found that the difference in profile height is a function of the nominal stone diameter and can be written as: 0.24 +Dn50 +0.18 In this case the dimension is [cm]. Apparently he found a difference of approximately 20% of the nominal diameter in profile height. A new version (which is not published yet) of the book ‘Maak- en meetnauwkeurigheden’ describes a difference in measured profile height of 21% of the nominal diameter between the spherical foot staff method and a conventional staff method.. |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.